🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.